Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LSCNX
FTHFX vs LSCNX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LSCNX
FTHFX vs LSCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LSCNX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and LSCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. LSCNX (350M). LSCNX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: LSCNX (0.97) vs FTHFX (0.56). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LSCNX: FTHFX (15 years) vs LSCNX (14 years). LSCNX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). LSCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FTHFX (1000000) and LSCNX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.66 vs. LSCNX (2.70). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 64.22 vs. LSCNX (-23.19).
| FTHFX | LSCNX | FTHFX / LSCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.85 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.87 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.040 | 19.671 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 350M | 3,457% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.97 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.66 | 2.70 | 802% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.45 | -1.42 | -4,455% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.22 | -23.19 | -277% |
| Returns for 10 years | 240.36 | -27.12 | -886% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement