Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LZSCX
FTHFX vs LZSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LZSCX
FTHFX vs LZSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LZSCX commentary
Sep 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and LZSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. LZSCX (34.6M). LZSCX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: LZSCX (0.68) vs FTHFX (0.56). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LZSCX: FTHFX (15 years) vs LZSCX (35 years). LZSCX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). LZSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). LZSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LZSCX (10000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.49 vs. LZSCX (14.05). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 62.58 vs. LZSCX (-19.24).
| FTHFX | LZSCX | FTHFX / LZSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.95 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.26 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.025 | 13.751 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 34.6M | 34,971% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.68 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.49 | 14.05 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.32 | 8.83 | 683% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.58 | -19.24 | -325% |
| Returns for 10 years | 240.77 | 3.27 | 7,354% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers