Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs MSCDX
FTHFX vs MSCDX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs MSCDX
FTHFX vs MSCDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. MSCDX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and MSCDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. MSCDX (605M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than MSCDX: FTHFX (0.56) vs MSCDX (0.47). FTHFX was incepted earlier than MSCDX: FTHFX (15 years) vs MSCDX (22 years). MSCDX (0.75) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). MSCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). MSCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: MSCDX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.72 vs. MSCDX (14.31). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. MSCDX (13.57).
| FTHFX | MSCDX | FTHFX / MSCDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.75 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.75 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.613 | 19.565 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 605M | 2,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.47 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.72 | 14.31 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.64 | 29.45 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.28 | 13.57 | 496% |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.65 | 56.07 | 431% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement