Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs MSCFX
FTHFX vs MSCFX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs MSCFX
FTHFX vs MSCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. MSCFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and MSCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. MSCFX (260M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than MSCFX: FTHFX (0.57) vs MSCFX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than MSCFX: FTHFX (15 years) vs MSCFX (15 years). MSCFX (0.97) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. MSCFX (19.00). MSCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: MSCFX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). MSCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.12 vs. FTHFX (25.56). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.58 vs. MSCFX (15.68).
| FTHFX | MSCFX | FTHFX / MSCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.97 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.97 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.175 | 20.828 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 260M | 4,654% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.00 | 23,407% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.56 | 29.12 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.30 | 31.91 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.58 | 15.68 | 418% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.04 | 73.45 | 315% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement