Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs MSCGX
FTHFX vs MSCGX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs MSCGX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.11
Change+$0.54 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.26B
Mercer US Small/Mid Cap Equity Y3
Price$11.74
Change+$0.12 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
FTHFX vs MSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. MSCGX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and MSCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. MSCGX (1.63B). MSCGX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: MSCGX (0.87) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than MSCGX: FTHFX (14 years) vs MSCGX (20 years). MSCGX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). MSCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). MSCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: MSCGX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.48 vs. MSCGX (-2.78). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 114.02 vs. MSCGX (20.42).
| FTHFX | MSCGX | FTHFX / MSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.50 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.99 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.326 | 4.728 | 218% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 1.63B | 692% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.87 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.48 | -2.78 | -89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.88 | 24.08 | 265% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.02 | 20.42 | 558% |
| Returns for 10 years | 189.61 | 16.64 | 1,140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers