Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs MSCGX
FTHFX vs MSCGX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs MSCGX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$41.58
Change+$0.83 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.26B
Mercer US Small/Mid Cap Equity Y3
Price$10.15
Change+$0.20 (+2.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
FTHFX vs MSCGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. MSCGX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and MSCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.26B vs. MSCGX (1.48B). MSCGX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: MSCGX (0.96) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than MSCGX: FTHFX (14 years) vs MSCGX (20 years). MSCGX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). MSCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). MSCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: MSCGX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.02 vs. MSCGX (-11.42). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.44 vs. MSCGX (24.38).
| FTHFX | MSCGX | FTHFX / MSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.55 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.01 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.282 | -11.240 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.26B | 1.48B | 627% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.96 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.02 | -11.42 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.86 | -10.09 | -217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.44 | 24.38 | 408% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.47 | -14.28 | -556% |