Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs MSCGX
FTHFX vs MSCGX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs MSCGX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.67
Change+$0.81 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.78B
Mercer US Small/Mid Cap Equity Y3
Price$11.50
Change+$0.10 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.66B
FTHFX vs MSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. MSCGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and MSCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. MSCGX (1.66B). MSCGX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: MSCGX (0.91) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than MSCGX: FTHFX (14 years) vs MSCGX (20 years). MSCGX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). MSCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). MSCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: MSCGX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.03 vs. MSCGX (-1.95). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.73 vs. MSCGX (19.37).
| FTHFX | MSCGX | FTHFX / MSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.55 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.01 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.954 | 2.587 | 191% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 1.66B | 651% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.91 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.03 | -1.95 | -104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.52 | 11.78 | 387% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.73 | 19.37 | 515% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.73 | 0.04 | 353,681% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement