Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs MSCGX
FTHFX vs MSCGX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs MSCGX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
Mercer US Small/Mid Cap Equity Y3
Price$11.41
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
FTHFX vs MSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. MSCGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and MSCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. MSCGX (1.57B). MSCGX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: MSCGX (0.87) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than MSCGX: FTHFX (14 years) vs MSCGX (20 years). MSCGX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). MSCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). MSCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: MSCGX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.11 vs. MSCGX (-9.60). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.21 vs. MSCGX (-0.02).
| FTHFX | MSCGX | FTHFX / MSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.50 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.99 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.957 | 1.784 | 390% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 1.57B | 687% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.87 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.11 | -9.60 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.76 | 7.25 | 507% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.21 | -0.02 | -333,297% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.87 | 5.57 | 2,872% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement