Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs MSCGX
FTHFX vs MSCGX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs MSCGX
FTHFX vs MSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. MSCGX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and MSCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. MSCGX (1.81B). MSCGX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: MSCGX (0.87) vs FTHFX (0.56). FTHFX was incepted earlier than MSCGX: FTHFX (15 years) vs MSCGX (21 years). MSCGX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). MSCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). MSCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: MSCGX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.72 vs. MSCGX (15.60). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. MSCGX (-5.80).
| FTHFX | MSCGX | FTHFX / MSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.50 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.71 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.613 | 18.288 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 1.81B | 667% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.87 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.72 | 15.60 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.64 | 30.52 | 212% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.28 | -5.80 | -1,160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.65 | 26.26 | 920% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement