Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NMSAX
FTHFX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NMSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.55
Change-$2.65 (-6.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.94B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$19.49
Change-$1.49 (-7.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.62B
FTHFX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NMSAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NMSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.94B vs. NMSAX (2.62B). NMSAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NMSAX (1.30) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NMSAX (28 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than NMSAX (0.45). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NMSAX (29.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NMSAX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.12 vs. NMSAX (-12.26). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 137.69 vs. NMSAX (53.12).
| FTHFX | NMSAX | FTHFX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.45 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.45 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.888 | -7.455 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.94B | 2.62B | 379% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.30 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.12 | -12.26 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.25 | -21.69 | -121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 137.69 | 53.12 | 259% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.07 | -5.37 | -1,714% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers