Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NMSAX
FTHFX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NMSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.38
Change-$0.10 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.69B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$21.01
Change-$0.03 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.54B
FTHFX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NMSAX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NMSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. NMSAX (2.54B). NMSAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NMSAX (1.27) vs FTHFX (0.74). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than NMSAX (0.45). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NMSAX (23.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NMSAX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.89 vs. NMSAX (-10.31). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 84.20 vs. NMSAX (4.51).
| FTHFX | NMSAX | FTHFX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.45 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.45 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.535 | -7.190 | -63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 2.54B | 422% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 1.27 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.89 | -10.31 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.71 | -16.77 | -213% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.20 | 4.51 | 1,867% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.73 | -0.78 | -19,311% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers