Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NMSAX
FTHFX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NMSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$45.96
Change-$1.64 (-3.45%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$22.74
Change-$0.96 (-4.05%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FTHFX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NMSAX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NMSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. NMSAX (3.05B). NMSAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NMSAX (1.18) vs FTHFX (0.95). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FTHFX (13 years) vs NMSAX (28 years). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. NMSAX (16.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NMSAX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.69 vs. NMSAX (1.64). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 78.82 vs. NMSAX (5.82).
| FTHFX | NMSAX | FTHFX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.441 | -0.797 | -1,686% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 3.05B | 347% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.18 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.69 | 1.64 | 895% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.34 | -12.58 | -257% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.82 | 5.82 | 1,354% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.19 | 13.08 | 873% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers