Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NMSAX
FTHFX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NMSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.20
Change+$0.35 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.7B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$20.43
Change+$0.37 (+1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.44B
FTHFX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NMSAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.7B vs. NMSAX (2.44B). NMSAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NMSAX (1.35) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than NMSAX (0.45). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NMSAX (29.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NMSAX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.34 vs. NMSAX (-16.17). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 97.33 vs. NMSAX (18.15).
| FTHFX | NMSAX | FTHFX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.45 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.45 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.658 | -11.513 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.7B | 2.44B | 398% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.35 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.34 | -16.17 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.91 | -15.45 | -220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.33 | 18.15 | 536% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.18 | -8.01 | -1,587% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers