Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NMSAX
FTHFX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NMSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.58
Change+$0.24 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.74B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$21.72
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.44B
FTHFX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NMSAX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NMSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. NMSAX (2.44B). NMSAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NMSAX (1.20) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than NMSAX (0.45). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NMSAX (23.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NMSAX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.71 vs. NMSAX (-15.72). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 77.88 vs. NMSAX (-2.73).
| FTHFX | NMSAX | FTHFX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.45 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.45 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.429 | -4.191 | -153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 2.44B | 439% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.20 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.71 | -15.72 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.08 | -9.45 | -382% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.88 | -2.73 | -2,852% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.59 | 3.84 | 4,127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement