Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NMSAX
FTHFX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NMSAX
FTHFX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NMSAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NMSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. NMSAX (2.53B). NMSAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NMSAX (0.90) vs FTHFX (0.56). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NMSAX (30 years). FTHFX (0.64) is less costly to investors than NMSAX (0.45). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. NMSAX (22.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NMSAX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.30 vs. NMSAX (4.22). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.92 vs. NMSAX (-15.32).
| FTHFX | NMSAX | FTHFX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.45 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.45 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.839 | 10.235 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 2.53B | 478% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.90 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | 4.22 | 362% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.68 | 8.54 | 687% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.92 | -15.32 | -398% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.29 | 16.39 | 1,448% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers