Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NMSAX
FTHFX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NMSAX
FTHFX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NMSAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NMSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. NMSAX (2.67B). NMSAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NMSAX (0.90) vs FTHFX (0.56). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NMSAX (30 years). FTHFX (0.64) is less costly to investors than NMSAX (0.45). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. NMSAX (22.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NMSAX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.72 vs. NMSAX (14.24). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. NMSAX (-11.34).
| FTHFX | NMSAX | FTHFX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.45 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.45 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.613 | 14.836 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 2.67B | 454% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.90 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.72 | 14.24 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.64 | 12.37 | 523% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.28 | -11.34 | -593% |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.65 | 17.89 | 1,351% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement