Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NMSCX
FTHFX vs NMSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NMSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.48
Change+$0.29 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.71B
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst
Price$21.34
Change+$0.06 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.54B
FTHFX vs NMSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NMSCX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NMSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. NMSCX (2.54B). NMSCX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NMSCX (1.47) vs FTHFX (0.74). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NMSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NMSCX (29 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than NMSCX (0.20). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NMSCX (23.00). NMSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NMSCX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.89 vs. NMSCX (-10.12). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 86.93 vs. NMSCX (7.53).
| FTHFX | NMSCX | FTHFX / NMSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.20 | 315% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.20 | 315% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.535 | -7.015 | -65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 2.54B | 421% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 1.47 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.89 | -10.12 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.50 | -11.86 | -350% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.93 | 7.53 | 1,154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.47 | 1.97 | 7,678% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers