Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NMSCX
FTHFX vs NMSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NMSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst
Price$22.02
Change-$0.03 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.43B
FTHFX vs NMSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NMSCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NMSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. NMSCX (2.43B). NMSCX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NMSCX (1.38) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NMSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NMSCX (29 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than NMSCX (0.20). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NMSCX (23.00). NMSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NMSCX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.11 vs. NMSCX (-15.58). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.21 vs. NMSCX (-1.12).
| FTHFX | NMSCX | FTHFX / NMSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.20 | 315% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.20 | 315% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.957 | -3.922 | -177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 2.43B | 444% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.38 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.11 | -15.58 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.76 | -8.50 | -433% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.21 | -1.12 | -7,098% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.87 | 6.39 | 2,500% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement