Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NMSCX
FTHFX vs NMSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NMSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.34
Change+$0.10 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.65B
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst
Price$23.50
Change+$0.12 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.96B
FTHFX vs NMSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NMSCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NMSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. NMSCX (2.96B). NMSCX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NMSCX (1.39) vs FTHFX (0.95). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NMSCX: FTHFX (13 years) vs NMSCX (28 years). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. NMSCX (16.00). NMSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NMSCX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.58 vs. NMSCX (2.31). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 75.76 vs. NMSCX (3.28).
| FTHFX | NMSCX | FTHFX / NMSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.227 | 2.397 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 2.96B | 358% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.39 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.58 | 2.31 | 632% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.29 | -13.91 | -232% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.76 | 3.28 | 2,309% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.48 | 15.38 | 764% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers