Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NMSCX
FTHFX vs NMSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NMSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$44.65
Change-$1.01 (-2.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.13B
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst
Price$22.49
Change-$0.62 (-2.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.78B
FTHFX vs NMSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NMSCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NMSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.1B vs. NMSCX (2.78B). NMSCX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NMSCX (1.39) vs FTHFX (0.95). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NMSCX: FTHFX (13 years) vs NMSCX (28 years). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. NMSCX (16.00). NMSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NMSCX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.86 vs. NMSCX (-4.87). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 69.97 vs. NMSCX (1.68).
| FTHFX | NMSCX | FTHFX / NMSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.695 | -2.004 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 2.78B | 364% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.39 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.86 | -4.87 | -59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.39 | -13.00 | -241% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.97 | 1.68 | 4,170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.29 | 4.48 | 2,129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers