Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NMSCX
FTHFX vs NMSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NMSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.56
Change-$0.26 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.19B
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst
Price$22.72
Change-$0.08 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.66B
FTHFX vs NMSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NMSCX commentary
Aug 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NMSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. NMSCX (2.66B). NMSCX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NMSCX (1.39) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NMSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NMSCX (29 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than NMSCX (0.20). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NMSCX (23.00). NMSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NMSCX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.41 vs. NMSCX (-8.64). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.44 vs. NMSCX (14.72).
| FTHFX | NMSCX | FTHFX / NMSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.20 | 315% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.20 | 315% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.687 | -0.654 | -1,482% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 2.66B | 421% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.39 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.41 | -8.64 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.39 | -3.27 | -1,541% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.44 | 14.72 | 655% |
| Returns for 10 years | 185.77 | 16.91 | 1,099% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement