Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NMSCX
FTHFX vs NMSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NMSCX
FTHFX vs NMSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NMSCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NMSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. NMSCX (2.67B). NMSCX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NMSCX (1.08) vs FTHFX (0.56). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NMSCX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NMSCX (30 years). FTHFX (0.64) is less costly to investors than NMSCX (0.20). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. NMSCX (22.00). NMSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NMSCX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.72 vs. NMSCX (14.76). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. NMSCX (-9.72).
| FTHFX | NMSCX | FTHFX / NMSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.20 | 320% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.20 | 320% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.613 | 15.125 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 2.67B | 454% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.08 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.72 | 14.76 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.64 | 13.70 | 472% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.28 | -9.72 | -692% |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.65 | 21.16 | 1,142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement