Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NRINX
FTHFX vs NRINX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NRINX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value R6
Price$23.78
Change-$0.07 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.19B
FTHFX vs NRINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NRINX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NRINX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. NRINX (1.19B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NRINX: FTHFX (0.70) vs NRINX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NRINX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NRINX (7 years). NRINX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NRINX (21.00). NRINX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NRINX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). NRINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.21 vs. FTHFX (-5.11). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.21 vs. NRINX (37.54).
| FTHFX | NRINX | FTHFX / NRINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.87 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.87 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.957 | 9.756 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 1.19B | 908% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.11 | 10.21 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.76 | 25.39 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.21 | 37.54 | 211% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement