Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NRINX
FTHFX vs NRINX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NRINX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$44.73
Change+$0.57 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.02B
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value R6
Price$20.36
Change+$0.24 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
FTHFX vs NRINX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NRINX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and NRINX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. NRINX (1.04B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NRINX: FTHFX (0.79) vs NRINX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NRINX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NRINX (6 years). NRINX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NRINX (21.00). NRINX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NRINX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.90 vs. NRINX (-3.96). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 80.01 vs. NRINX (38.66).
| FTHFX | NRINX | FTHFX / NRINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.87 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.87 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.774 | -7.409 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 1.04B | 962% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.90 | -3.96 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.29 | -1.03 | -2,739% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.01 | 38.66 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement