Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCCX
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.50
Change-$0.21 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.63B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps C
Price$37.60
Change-$0.24 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets240.5M
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCCX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. NSCCX (241M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSCCX: FTHFX (0.76) vs NSCCX (0.08). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCCX (21 years). NSCCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.85 vs. NSCCX (-20.69). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 95.63 vs. NSCCX (27.71).
| FTHFX | NSCCX | FTHFX / NSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.10 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.840 | -1.098 | -259% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 241M | 4,398% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.08 | 959% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.85 | -20.69 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.68 | 8.63 | 553% |
| Returns for 5 years | 95.63 | 27.71 | 345% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.61 | -6.38 | -2,265% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers