Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCCX
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.48
Change+$0.29 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.71B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps C
Price$37.12
Change+$0.07 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.19M
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCCX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. NSCCX (237M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSCCX: FTHFX (0.74) vs NSCCX (0.08). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCCX (21 years). NSCCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.89 vs. NSCCX (-18.92). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 86.93 vs. NSCCX (17.56).
| FTHFX | NSCCX | FTHFX / NSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.10 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.535 | -2.980 | -152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 237M | 4,515% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.08 | 922% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.89 | -18.92 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.50 | -2.37 | -1,751% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.93 | 17.56 | 495% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.47 | -2.95 | -5,142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers