Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NSCCX
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$42.34
Change-$0.81 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.76B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps C
Price$35.61
Change-$0.88 (-2.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets212.84M
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCCX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.76B vs. NSCCX (213M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSCCX: FTHFX (0.78) vs NSCCX (0.08). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCCX (20 years). NSCCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.15 vs. NSCCX (-16.03). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 108.72 vs. NSCCX (30.81).
| FTHFX | NSCCX | FTHFX / NSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.10 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.998 | -4.626 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.76B | 213M | 4,583% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.08 | 994% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.15 | -16.03 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.26 | -9.83 | -287% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.72 | 30.81 | 353% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.93 | -11.21 | -838% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers