Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NSCCX
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.24
Change+$1.01 (+2.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.8B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps C
Price$35.79
Change+$0.92 (+2.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets226.29M
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCCX commentary
May 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.8B vs. NSCCX (226M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSCCX: FTHFX (0.82) vs NSCCX (0.08). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCCX (20 years). NSCCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.25 vs. NSCCX (-16.68). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 104.85 vs. NSCCX (31.74).
| FTHFX | NSCCX | FTHFX / NSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.10 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.800 | -6.456 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.8B | 226M | 4,335% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.08 | 977% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.25 | -16.68 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.18 | -6.29 | -496% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.85 | 31.74 | 330% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.64 | -11.57 | -801% |