Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCCX
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$44.16
Change+$0.05 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.01B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps C
Price$36.06
Change+$0.07 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets226.83M
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCCX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. NSCCX (227M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSCCX: FTHFX (0.79) vs NSCCX (0.08). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCCX (21 years). NSCCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.67 vs. NSCCX (-18.95). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.80 vs. NSCCX (9.82).
| FTHFX | NSCCX | FTHFX / NSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.10 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.884 | -5.933 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 227M | 4,405% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.08 | 962% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.67 | -18.95 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.39 | -8.02 | -366% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.80 | 9.82 | 813% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.67 | -12.79 | -1,068% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement