Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCCX
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.98
Change+$0.13 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.31B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps C
Price$39.66
Change+$0.12 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets258.98M
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. NSCCX (259M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSCCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs NSCCX (0.08). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCCX (21 years). NSCCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.76 vs. NSCCX (-19.14). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 107.61 vs. NSCCX (30.20).
| FTHFX | NSCCX | FTHFX / NSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.10 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.753 | 3.346 | 292% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 259M | 4,363% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.08 | 928% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.76 | -19.14 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.60 | 7.91 | 703% |
| Returns for 5 years | 107.61 | 30.20 | 356% |
| Returns for 10 years | 177.04 | 7.36 | 2,407% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement