Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCCX
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps C
Price$38.67
Change+$0.19 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.41M
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. NSCCX (255M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSCCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs NSCCX (0.08). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCCX (21 years). NSCCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.11 vs. NSCCX (-26.29). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.21 vs. NSCCX (8.84).
| FTHFX | NSCCX | FTHFX / NSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.10 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.957 | 0.575 | 1,210% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 255M | 4,235% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.08 | 931% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.11 | -26.29 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.76 | -3.46 | -1,063% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.21 | 8.84 | 896% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.87 | -2.47 | -6,479% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers