Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCCX
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCCX
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. NSCCX (310M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSCCX: FTHFX (0.57) vs NSCCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCCX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NSCCX (22 years). NSCCX (2.05) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). NSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). NSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.56 vs. NSCCX (17.64). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.58 vs. NSCCX (-4.65).
| FTHFX | NSCCX | FTHFX / NSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.95 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 2.05 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.175 | 21.123 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 310M | 3,903% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.56 | 17.64 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.30 | 14.53 | 381% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.58 | -4.65 | -1,411% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.04 | 9.13 | 2,530% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement