Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCCX
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCCX
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. NSCCX (309M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSCCX: FTHFX (0.59) vs NSCCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCCX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NSCCX (22 years). NSCCX (2.05) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). NSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). NSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.99 vs. NSCCX (21.27). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 61.64 vs. NSCCX (-8.43).
| FTHFX | NSCCX | FTHFX / NSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.95 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 2.05 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.922 | 19.671 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 309M | 3,625% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.99 | 21.27 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.63 | 18.98 | 325% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.64 | -8.43 | -731% |
| Returns for 10 years | 248.41 | 14.24 | 1,745% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers