Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCCX
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCCX
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. NSCCX (320M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSCCX: FTHFX (0.56) vs NSCCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCCX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NSCCX (22 years). NSCCX (2.05) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). NSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). NSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.72 vs. NSCCX (18.74). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. NSCCX (-0.56).
| FTHFX | NSCCX | FTHFX / NSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.95 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 2.05 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.613 | 24.137 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 320M | 3,781% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.72 | 18.74 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.64 | 20.31 | 318% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.28 | -0.56 | -11,931% |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.65 | 7.35 | 3,286% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers