Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCFX
FTHFX vs NSCFX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCFX
FTHFX vs NSCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. NSCFX (307M). NSCFX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSCFX (0.67) vs FTHFX (0.59). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCFX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NSCFX (13 years). NSCFX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). NSCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FTHFX (1000000) and NSCFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.99 vs. NSCFX (26.62). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 61.64 vs. NSCFX (11.36).
| FTHFX | NSCFX | FTHFX / NSCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.81 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.91 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.922 | 20.356 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 307M | 3,648% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.67 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.99 | 26.62 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.63 | 35.97 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.64 | 11.36 | 543% |
| Returns for 10 years | 248.41 | 53.32 | 466% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement