Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCFX
FTHFX vs NSCFX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCFX
FTHFX vs NSCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. NSCFX (320M). NSCFX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSCFX (0.65) vs FTHFX (0.56). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCFX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NSCFX (14 years). NSCFX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). NSCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FTHFX (1000000) and NSCFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX (24.72) and NSCFX (24.01) have marching annual gain over last year. FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. NSCFX (20.96).
| FTHFX | NSCFX | FTHFX / NSCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.81 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.91 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.613 | 25.121 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 320M | 3,781% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.65 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.72 | 24.01 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.64 | 37.50 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.28 | 20.96 | 321% |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.65 | 44.15 | 547% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement