Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCKX
FTHFX vs NSCKX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCKX
FTHFX vs NSCKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCKX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSCKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. NSCKX (377M). NSCKX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSCKX (0.61) vs FTHFX (0.56). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCKX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NSCKX (6 years). FTHFX (0.64) is less costly to investors than NSCKX (0.48). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. NSCKX (18.92). NSCKX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCKX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.30 vs. NSCKX (5.36). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.92 vs. NSCKX (-8.80).
| FTHFX | NSCKX | FTHFX / NSCKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.41 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.48 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.839 | 19.223 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 377M | 3,210% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.61 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | 5.36 | 286% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.68 | 14.34 | 409% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.92 | -8.80 | -692% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers