Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCKX
FTHFX vs NSCKX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCKX
FTHFX vs NSCKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCKX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and NSCKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. NSCKX (382M). NSCKX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSCKX (0.63) vs FTHFX (0.59). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCKX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NSCKX (6 years). FTHFX (0.64) is less costly to investors than NSCKX (0.47). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. NSCKX (17.68). NSCKX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCKX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.20 vs. NSCKX (17.99). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 54.56 vs. NSCKX (-11.95).
| FTHFX | NSCKX | FTHFX / NSCKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.42 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.47 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.709 | 16.908 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 382M | 2,932% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.63 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.20 | 17.99 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.18 | 14.48 | 416% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.56 | -11.95 | -456% |
| Returns for 10 years | 240.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement