Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCKX
FTHFX vs NSCKX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCKX
FTHFX vs NSCKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCKX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSCKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. NSCKX (392M). NSCKX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSCKX (0.61) vs FTHFX (0.56). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCKX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NSCKX (6 years). FTHFX (0.64) is less costly to investors than NSCKX (0.47). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. NSCKX (18.92). NSCKX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCKX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.72 vs. NSCKX (16.10). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. NSCKX (-3.45).
| FTHFX | NSCKX | FTHFX / NSCKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.42 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.47 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.613 | 23.894 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 392M | 3,087% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.61 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.72 | 16.10 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.64 | 18.82 | 343% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.28 | -3.45 | -1,948% |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement