Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NSGRX
FTHFX vs NSGRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSGRX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$41.58
Change+$0.83 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.26B
Northern Small Cap Core I
Price$22.62
Change+$0.42 (+1.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.62M
FTHFX vs NSGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSGRX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.26B vs. NSGRX (330M). NSGRX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSGRX (1.11) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSGRX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSGRX (26 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than NSGRX (0.59). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NSGRX (15.33). NSGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSGRX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.02 vs. NSGRX (-17.33). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.44 vs. NSGRX (18.26).
| FTHFX | NSGRX | FTHFX / NSGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.54 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.59 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.282 | -12.288 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.26B | 330M | 2,807% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.11 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.02 | -17.33 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.86 | -13.85 | -158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.44 | 18.26 | 545% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.47 | 6.60 | 1,203% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers