Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSGRX
FTHFX vs NSGRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSGRX
FTHFX vs NSGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSGRX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. NSGRX (377M). NSGRX (0.57) and FTHFX (0.56) have matching dividends . FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSGRX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NSGRX (27 years). FTHFX (0.64) is less costly to investors than NSGRX (0.58). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. NSGRX (18.92). NSGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSGRX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.30 vs. NSGRX (5.24). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.92 vs. NSGRX (-9.28).
| FTHFX | NSGRX | FTHFX / NSGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.51 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.58 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.839 | 19.115 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 377M | 3,210% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.57 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | 5.24 | 292% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.68 | 13.97 | 420% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.92 | -9.28 | -656% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.29 | 46.35 | 512% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers