Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSGRX
FTHFX vs NSGRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSGRX
FTHFX vs NSGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSGRX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and NSGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. NSGRX (379M). FTHFX (0.59) and NSGRX (0.59) have matching dividends . FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSGRX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NSGRX (27 years). FTHFX (0.64) is less costly to investors than NSGRX (0.57). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. NSGRX (17.68). NSGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSGRX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.17 vs. NSGRX (18.81). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 54.70 vs. NSGRX (-12.72).
| FTHFX | NSGRX | FTHFX / NSGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.52 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.57 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.196 | 16.012 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 379M | 2,955% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.59 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.17 | 18.81 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.44 | 13.33 | 446% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.70 | -12.72 | -430% |
| Returns for 10 years | 239.03 | 47.93 | 499% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers