Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSGRX
FTHFX vs NSGRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSGRX
FTHFX vs NSGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSGRX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. NSGRX (392M). NSGRX (0.57) and FTHFX (0.56) have matching dividends . FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSGRX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NSGRX (27 years). FTHFX (0.64) is less costly to investors than NSGRX (0.57). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. NSGRX (18.92). NSGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSGRX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.72 vs. NSGRX (15.98). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. NSGRX (-3.95).
| FTHFX | NSGRX | FTHFX / NSGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.52 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.57 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.613 | 23.790 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 392M | 3,087% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.57 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.72 | 15.98 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.64 | 18.44 | 351% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.28 | -3.95 | -1,703% |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.65 | 48.10 | 502% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement