Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSGRX
FTHFX vs NSGRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSGRX
FTHFX vs NSGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSGRX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. NSGRX (392M). FTHFX (0.57) and NSGRX (0.56) have matching dividends . FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSGRX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NSGRX (27 years). FTHFX (0.64) is less costly to investors than NSGRX (0.57). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. NSGRX (18.92). NSGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSGRX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.56 vs. NSGRX (16.50). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.58 vs. NSGRX (-6.01).
| FTHFX | NSGRX | FTHFX / NSGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.52 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.57 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.175 | 21.804 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 392M | 3,087% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.56 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.56 | 16.50 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.30 | 13.17 | 420% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.58 | -6.01 | -1,091% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.04 | 50.01 | 462% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement