Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NSMAX
FTHFX vs NSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$41.58
Change+$0.83 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.26B
Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value A
Price$29.02
Change+$0.55 (+1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets77.56M
FTHFX vs NSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.26B vs. NSMAX (77.6M). NSMAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSMAX (1.13) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSMAX (18 years). NSMAX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMAX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). NSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.43 vs. FTHFX (-8.02). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.44 vs. NSMAX (64.74).
| FTHFX | NSMAX | FTHFX / NSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.31 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.42 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.282 | -10.836 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.26B | 77.6M | 11,938% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.13 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.02 | -7.43 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.86 | 3.51 | 622% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.44 | 64.74 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.47 | 0.07 | 109,017% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers