Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSMAX
FTHFX vs NSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value A
Price$34.20
Change+$0.02 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.85M
FTHFX vs NSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. NSMAX (96.8M). NSMAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSMAX (0.99) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSMAX (19 years). NSMAX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMAX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). NSMAX (-5.68) and FTHFX (-5.71) have marching annual gain over last year. FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 77.88 vs. NSMAX (45.06).
| FTHFX | NSMAX | FTHFX / NSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.31 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.42 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.429 | 7.047 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 96.8M | 11,157% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.99 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.71 | -5.68 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.08 | 25.54 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.88 | 45.06 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.59 | 24.77 | 640% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement