Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NSMAX
FTHFX vs NSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.55
Change-$2.65 (-6.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.94B
Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value A
Price$28.84
Change-$2.12 (-6.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.18M
FTHFX vs NSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.94B vs. NSMAX (84.2M). NSMAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSMAX (1.13) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSMAX (18 years). NSMAX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMAX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). NSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.73 vs. FTHFX (-5.12). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 137.69 vs. NSMAX (102.83).
| FTHFX | NSMAX | FTHFX / NSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.31 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.42 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.888 | -3.038 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.94B | 84.2M | 11,802% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.13 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.12 | -1.73 | 295% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.25 | 8.63 | 304% |
| Returns for 5 years | 137.69 | 102.83 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.07 | 7.13 | 1,291% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers