Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSMAX
FTHFX vs NSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.56
Change-$0.26 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.19B
Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value A
Price$34.05
Change-$0.12 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.51M
FTHFX vs NSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMAX commentary
Sep 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. NSMAX (94.5M). NSMAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSMAX (1.02) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSMAX (19 years). NSMAX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMAX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.87 vs. NSMAX (-0.51). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 95.41 vs. NSMAX (60.31).
| FTHFX | NSMAX | FTHFX / NSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.31 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.42 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.115 | 6.640 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 94.5M | 11,852% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.02 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.87 | -0.51 | -760% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.60 | 30.74 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 95.41 | 60.31 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 184.28 | 36.24 | 509% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement