Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSMAX
FTHFX vs NSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.71
Change+$0.55 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.5B
Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value A
Price$32.79
Change+$0.43 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.3M
FTHFX vs NSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMAX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. NSMAX (93.3M). NSMAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSMAX (1.09) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSMAX (19 years). NSMAX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMAX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.02 vs. NSMAX (-3.86). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.33 vs. NSMAX (62.23).
| FTHFX | NSMAX | FTHFX / NSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.31 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.42 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.629 | 1.347 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 93.3M | 11,254% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.09 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.02 | -3.86 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.95 | 33.66 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.33 | 62.23 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.73 | 16.02 | 885% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers