Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSMAX
FTHFX vs NSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMAX
FTHFX vs NSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. NSMAX (129M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSMAX: FTHFX (0.59) vs NSMAX (0.39). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMAX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NSMAX (20 years). NSMAX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). NSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). NSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMAX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.99 vs. NSMAX (29.22). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 61.64 vs. NSMAX (26.40).
| FTHFX | NSMAX | FTHFX / NSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.16 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.35 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.922 | 18.451 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 129M | 8,682% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.39 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.99 | 29.22 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.63 | 51.04 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.64 | 26.40 | 234% |
| Returns for 10 years | 248.41 | 49.98 | 497% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement