Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSMAX
FTHFX vs NSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMAX
FTHFX vs NSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. NSMAX (129M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSMAX: FTHFX (0.57) vs NSMAX (0.38). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMAX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NSMAX (20 years). NSMAX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). NSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). NSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMAX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.56 vs. NSMAX (22.14). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.58 vs. NSMAX (28.62).
| FTHFX | NSMAX | FTHFX / NSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.16 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.35 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.175 | 18.541 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 129M | 9,380% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.38 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.56 | 22.14 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.30 | 44.20 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.58 | 28.62 | 229% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.04 | 41.56 | 556% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement