Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSMAX
FTHFX vs NSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMAX
FTHFX vs NSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. NSMAX (131M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSMAX: FTHFX (0.56) vs NSMAX (0.39). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMAX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NSMAX (20 years). NSMAX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). NSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). NSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMAX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.72 vs. NSMAX (21.33). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. NSMAX (29.54).
| FTHFX | NSMAX | FTHFX / NSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.16 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.35 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.613 | 18.331 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 131M | 9,237% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.39 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.72 | 21.33 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.64 | 48.77 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.28 | 29.54 | 228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.65 | 36.02 | 671% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement