Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSMCX
FTHFX vs NSMCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.37
Change-$0.38 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.99B
Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value C
Price$26.01
Change-$0.20 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.02M
FTHFX vs NSMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMCX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. NSMCX (94M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSMCX: FTHFX (0.74) vs NSMCX (0.38). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSMCX (19 years). NSMCX (2.17) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. NSMCX (-3.87). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 89.14 vs. NSMCX (41.43).
| FTHFX | NSMCX | FTHFX / NSMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.06 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.17 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.495 | 3.474 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 94M | 11,702% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.38 | 196% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.59 | -3.87 | -119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.22 | 13.11 | 284% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.14 | 41.43 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.43 | 2.60 | 5,938% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement