Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSMCX
FTHFX vs NSMCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.67
Change+$0.81 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.6B
Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value C
Price$25.86
Change+$0.14 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.51M
FTHFX vs NSMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. NSMCX (94.5M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSMCX: FTHFX (0.76) vs NSMCX (0.38). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSMCX (19 years). NSMCX (2.17) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.29 vs. NSMCX (-4.34). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.34 vs. NSMCX (46.80).
| FTHFX | NSMCX | FTHFX / NSMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.06 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.17 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.170 | 1.540 | 206% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 94.5M | 11,217% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.38 | 201% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.29 | -4.34 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.05 | 22.18 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.34 | 46.80 | 206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.43 | 0.06 | 244,158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement