Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSMCX
FTHFX vs NSMCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.58
Change+$0.24 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.74B
Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value C
Price$26.96
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.85M
FTHFX vs NSMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. NSMCX (96.8M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSMCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs NSMCX (0.35). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSMCX (19 years). NSMCX (2.17) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.71 vs. NSMCX (-8.51). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 77.88 vs. NSMCX (31.31).
| FTHFX | NSMCX | FTHFX / NSMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.06 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.17 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.429 | 6.356 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 96.8M | 11,054% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.35 | 201% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.71 | -8.51 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.08 | 18.56 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.88 | 31.31 | 249% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.59 | 3.61 | 4,396% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement