Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSMCX
FTHFX vs NSMCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMCX
FTHFX vs NSMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMCX commentary
Jun 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. NSMCX (127M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSMCX: FTHFX (0.59) vs NSMCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMCX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NSMCX (20 years). NSMCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). NSMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). NSMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.59 vs. NSMCX (23.00). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 59.73 vs. NSMCX (9.42).
| FTHFX | NSMCX | FTHFX / NSMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.91 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 2.10 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.653 | 17.186 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 127M | 8,819% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.59 | 23.00 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.82 | 40.02 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.73 | 9.42 | 634% |
| Returns for 10 years | 260.18 | 25.10 | 1,037% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers