Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSMCX
FTHFX vs NSMCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMCX
FTHFX vs NSMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMCX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. NSMCX (129M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSMCX: FTHFX (0.56) vs NSMCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMCX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NSMCX (20 years). NSMCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). NSMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). NSMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.34 vs. NSMCX (12.93). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.53 vs. NSMCX (11.00).
| FTHFX | NSMCX | FTHFX / NSMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.91 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 2.10 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.526 | 15.879 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 129M | 9,380% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.34 | 12.93 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.60 | 32.12 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.53 | 11.00 | 550% |
| Returns for 10 years | 233.87 | 9.60 | 2,436% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers