Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSMRX
FTHFX vs NSMRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMRX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.40
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.28B
Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value I
Price$36.25
Change-$0.05 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.14M
FTHFX vs NSMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMRX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. NSMRX (99.1M). NSMRX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSMRX (1.22) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMRX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSMRX (19 years). NSMRX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMRX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.80 vs. NSMRX (0.01). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 101.48 vs. NSMRX (69.05).
| FTHFX | NSMRX | FTHFX / NSMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.06 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.17 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.008 | 9.767 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 99.1M | 11,403% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.22 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.80 | 0.01 | 38,283% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.37 | 45.33 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.48 | 69.05 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 174.23 | 37.81 | 461% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement