Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSMRX
FTHFX vs NSMRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMRX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.11B
Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value I
Price$31.91
Change-$0.52 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.05M
FTHFX vs NSMRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMRX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSMRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.1B vs. NSMRX (88.1M). NSMRX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSMRX (1.37) vs FTHFX (0.79). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMRX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSMRX (19 years). NSMRX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMRX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.23 vs. NSMRX (-0.82). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.61 vs. NSMRX (64.03).
| FTHFX | NSMRX | FTHFX / NSMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.06 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.17 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.202 | -1.935 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 88.1M | 11,464% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.37 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.23 | -0.82 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.67 | 29.53 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.61 | 64.03 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.97 | 13.81 | 985% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers