Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSMRX
FTHFX vs NSMRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMRX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.83
Change+$0.34 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.56B
Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value I
Price$33.81
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.28M
FTHFX vs NSMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMRX commentary
Jul 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSMRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. NSMRX (93.3M). NSMRX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSMRX (1.32) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMRX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSMRX (19 years). NSMRX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMRX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.80 vs. NSMRX (2.75). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 105.15 vs. NSMRX (76.20).
| FTHFX | NSMRX | FTHFX / NSMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.06 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.17 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.136 | 1.814 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 93.3M | 11,361% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.32 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.80 | 2.75 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.95 | 33.70 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 105.15 | 76.20 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 147.04 | 21.16 | 695% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement