Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSMRX
FTHFX vs NSMRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMRX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.65
Change+$1.21 (+2.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.24B
Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value I
Price$35.09
Change+$1.09 (+3.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.99M
FTHFX vs NSMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMRX commentary
Aug 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. NSMRX (95M). NSMRX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSMRX (1.31) vs FTHFX (0.74). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMRX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSMRX (19 years). NSMRX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMRX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.17 vs. NSMRX (1.18). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 98.87 vs. NSMRX (67.51).
| FTHFX | NSMRX | FTHFX / NSMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.06 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.17 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.313 | 6.108 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 95M | 11,789% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 1.31 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.17 | 1.18 | 523% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.60 | 27.83 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.87 | 67.51 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 190.87 | 43.86 | 435% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement