Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSMRX
FTHFX vs NSMRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMRX
FTHFX vs NSMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMRX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. NSMRX (126M). NSMRX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSMRX (0.59) vs FTHFX (0.56). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMRX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NSMRX (20 years). NSMRX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). NSMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). NSMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMRX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.30 vs. NSMRX (10.90). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.92 vs. NSMRX (28.93).
| FTHFX | NSMRX | FTHFX / NSMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.91 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.10 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.839 | 14.487 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 126M | 9,603% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.59 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | 10.90 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.68 | 43.19 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.92 | 28.93 | 211% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.29 | 42.68 | 556% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers