Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NWGPX
FTHFX vs NWGPX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NWGPX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
Nationwide WCM Focused Sm Cp A
Price$27.18
Change+$0.15 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets181.57M
FTHFX vs NWGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NWGPX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NWGPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. NWGPX (182M). NWGPX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NWGPX (0.81) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NWGPX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NWGPX (18 years). NWGPX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NWGPX (17.79). NWGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NWGPX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.98 vs. NWGPX (-7.50). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. NWGPX (39.53).
| FTHFX | NWGPX | FTHFX / NWGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.22 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | -5.723 | -57% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 182M | 5,879% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.81 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | -7.50 | -80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | 10.38 | 479% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | 39.53 | 260% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | -13.03 | -1,164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers