Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NWGPX
FTHFX vs NWGPX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NWGPX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.34
Change+$0.27 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.13B
Nationwide WCM Focused Sm Cp A
Price$24.34
Change+$0.19 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.11M
FTHFX vs NWGPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NWGPX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NWGPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.14B vs. NWGPX (165M). NWGPX (0.83) and FTHFX (0.82) have matching dividends . FTHFX was incepted earlier than NWGPX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NWGPX (18 years). NWGPX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NWGPX (17.79). NWGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NWGPX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.16 vs. NWGPX (-13.79). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.37 vs. NWGPX (45.94).
| FTHFX | NWGPX | FTHFX / NWGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.22 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.779 | -16.233 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.14B | 165M | 5,536% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.83 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.16 | -13.79 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.87 | -6.92 | -287% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.37 | 45.94 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.84 | -24.72 | -311% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers