Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NWGPX
FTHFX vs NWGPX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NWGPX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
Nationwide WCM Focused Sm Cp A
Price$25.77
Change-$0.11 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.88M
FTHFX vs NWGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NWGPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NWGPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. NWGPX (88.9M). NWGPX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NWGPX (0.80) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NWGPX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NWGPX (19 years). NWGPX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NWGPX (17.79). NWGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NWGPX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.11 vs. NWGPX (-17.93). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.21 vs. NWGPX (12.70).
| FTHFX | NWGPX | FTHFX / NWGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.22 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.957 | -10.614 | -66% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 88.9M | 12,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.80 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.11 | -17.93 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.76 | 2.20 | 1,673% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.21 | 12.70 | 624% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.87 | -14.33 | -1,116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement