Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NWGPX
FTHFX vs NWGPX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NWGPX
FTHFX vs NWGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NWGPX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NWGPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. NWGPX (21.2M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NWGPX: FTHFX (0.56) vs NWGPX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NWGPX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NWGPX (20 years). NWGPX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). NWGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.29 vs. FTHFX (28.00). NWGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NWGPX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.30 vs. NWGPX (-23.50). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.92 vs. NWGPX (-20.95).
| FTHFX | NWGPX | FTHFX / NWGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.11 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.45 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.839 | 1.930 | 769% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 21.2M | 57,075% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | -23.50 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.68 | -18.45 | -318% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.92 | -20.95 | -291% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.29 | -28.63 | -829% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers