Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NWGPX
FTHFX vs NWGPX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NWGPX
FTHFX vs NWGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NWGPX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NWGPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. NWGPX (23M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NWGPX: FTHFX (0.56) vs NWGPX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NWGPX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NWGPX (19 years). NWGPX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). NWGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.29 vs. FTHFX (28.00). NWGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NWGPX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.72 vs. NWGPX (-17.29). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. NWGPX (-16.58).
| FTHFX | NWGPX | FTHFX / NWGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.11 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.45 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.613 | 7.910 | 235% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 23M | 52,609% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.72 | -17.29 | -143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.64 | -15.52 | -416% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.28 | -16.58 | -406% |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.65 | -26.62 | -908% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement