Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NWGSX
FTHFX vs NWGSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NWGSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$39.57
Change-$1.45 (-3.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.41B
Nationwide WCM Focused Sm Cp Instl Svc
Price$25.87
Change-$0.74 (-2.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets170.67M
FTHFX vs NWGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NWGSX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NWGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.41B vs. NWGSX (171M). NWGSX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NWGSX (1.08) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NWGSX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NWGSX (18 years). NWGSX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NWGSX (17.79). NWGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NWGSX (50000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.51 vs. NWGSX (-13.86). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 92.14 vs. NWGSX (47.88).
| FTHFX | NWGSX | FTHFX / NWGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.88 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.94 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.687 | -13.548 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 50000 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.41B | 171M | 5,500% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.08 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.51 | -13.86 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.93 | -2.69 | -889% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.14 | 47.88 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.25 | -18.58 | -437% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...