Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NWGSX
FTHFX vs NWGSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NWGSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
Nationwide WCM Focused Sm Cp Instl Svc
Price$27.58
Change-$0.12 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.88M
FTHFX vs NWGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NWGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NWGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. NWGSX (88.9M). NWGSX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NWGSX (1.04) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NWGSX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NWGSX (19 years). NWGSX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NWGSX (17.79). NWGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NWGSX (50000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.11 vs. NWGSX (-17.47). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.21 vs. NWGSX (14.97).
| FTHFX | NWGSX | FTHFX / NWGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.88 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.94 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.957 | -10.396 | -67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 50000 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 88.9M | 12,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.04 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.11 | -17.47 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.76 | 3.54 | 1,039% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.21 | 14.97 | 529% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.87 | -9.81 | -1,630% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement