Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NWGSX
FTHFX vs NWGSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NWGSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.16
Change+$0.61 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.26B
Nationwide WCM Focused Sm Cp Instl Svc
Price$30.07
Change+$0.34 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets182.9M
FTHFX vs NWGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NWGSX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NWGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. NWGSX (183M). NWGSX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NWGSX (0.99) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NWGSX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NWGSX (19 years). NWGSX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NWGSX (17.79). NWGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NWGSX (50000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.34 vs. NWGSX (-9.81). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 101.11 vs. NWGSX (37.09).
| FTHFX | NWGSX | FTHFX / NWGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.88 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.94 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.093 | -3.411 | -267% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 50000 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 183M | 6,175% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.99 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.34 | -9.81 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.36 | 16.34 | 327% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.11 | 37.09 | 273% |
| Returns for 10 years | 182.11 | 2.36 | 7,733% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement