Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NWGSX
FTHFX vs NWGSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NWGSX
FTHFX vs NWGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NWGSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NWGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. NWGSX (22.6M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NWGSX: FTHFX (0.57) vs NWGSX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NWGSX: FTHFX (15 years) vs NWGSX (19 years). NWGSX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). NWGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.29 vs. FTHFX (28.00). NWGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NWGSX (50000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.56 vs. NWGSX (-16.74). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.58 vs. NWGSX (-16.37).
| FTHFX | NWGSX | FTHFX / NWGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.83 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.17 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.175 | 3.801 | 399% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 50000 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 22.6M | 53,540% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.56 | -16.74 | -153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.30 | -18.71 | -296% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.58 | -16.37 | -401% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.04 | -22.07 | -1,047% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement