Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs QLSCX
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QLSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$45.96
Change-$1.64 (-3.45%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$26.86
Change-$1.11 (-3.97%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QLSCX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and QLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. QLSCX (1.48B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: FTHFX (0.95) vs QLSCX (0.30). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: FTHFX (13 years) vs QLSCX (8 years). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 128.00 vs. FTHFX (35.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QLSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.01 vs. FTHFX (14.69). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 78.82 vs. QLSCX (41.13).
| FTHFX | QLSCX | FTHFX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.441 | 19.326 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 1.48B | 718% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.30 | 316% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.69 | 23.01 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.34 | 11.60 | 279% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.82 | 41.13 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...