Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs QLSCX
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QLSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$52.18
Change-$0.55 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$27.81
Change-$0.50 (-1.77%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QLSCX commentary
Nov 15, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and QLSCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. QLSCX (1.47B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: FTHFX (0.95) vs QLSCX (0.30). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: FTHFX (13 years) vs QLSCX (8 years). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 128.00 vs. FTHFX (35.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QLSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX (35.83) and QLSCX (35.56) have marching annual gain over last year. FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 101.76 vs. QLSCX (45.98).
| FTHFX | QLSCX | FTHFX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.357 | 18.643 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 1.47B | 763% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.30 | 316% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.83 | 35.56 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.10 | -12.36 | -284% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.76 | 45.98 | 221% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...