Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QLSCX
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QLSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$28.82
Change-$0.10 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.44B
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QLSCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and QLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. QLSCX (1.44B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs QLSCX (0.32). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QLSCX (9 years). QLSCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QLSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.75 vs. FTHFX (-5.11). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.21 vs. QLSCX (39.26).
| FTHFX | QLSCX | FTHFX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.88 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.89 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.957 | 7.457 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 1.44B | 748% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.32 | 223% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.11 | 4.75 | -108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.76 | 40.64 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.21 | 39.26 | 202% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.87 | N/A | - |