Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs QLSCX
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QLSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$42.85
Change+$0.04 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.69B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$24.24
Change+$0.19 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QLSCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and QLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.69B vs. QLSCX (1.26B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: FTHFX (0.82) vs QLSCX (0.41). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QLSCX (9 years). QLSCX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QLSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.61 vs. FTHFX (-5.34). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 97.14 vs. QLSCX (54.63).
| FTHFX | QLSCX | FTHFX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.88 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.88 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.746 | -10.328 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.69B | 1.26B | 771% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.41 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.34 | 0.61 | -879% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.96 | 10.78 | 287% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.14 | 54.63 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...