Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QLSCX
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QLSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.85
Change-$0.19 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.31B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$29.91
Change-$0.13 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.51B
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QLSCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and QLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. QLSCX (1.51B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs QLSCX (0.33). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QLSCX (9 years). QLSCX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QLSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.98 vs. FTHFX (4.76). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 106.16 vs. QLSCX (68.07).
| FTHFX | QLSCX | FTHFX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.88 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.88 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.172 | 12.006 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 1.51B | 746% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.33 | 216% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.76 | 14.98 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.19 | 48.46 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 106.16 | 68.07 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.10 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers