Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs QLSCX
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QLSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.34
Change+$0.27 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.13B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$22.65
Change+$0.23 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.17B
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QLSCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and QLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.14B vs. QLSCX (1.17B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: FTHFX (0.82) vs QLSCX (0.40). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QLSCX (9 years). QLSCX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QLSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.01 vs. FTHFX (-7.16). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.37 vs. QLSCX (56.41).
| FTHFX | QLSCX | FTHFX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.88 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.88 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.779 | -16.406 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.14B | 1.17B | 783% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.40 | 205% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.16 | -1.01 | 708% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.87 | -3.84 | -517% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.37 | 56.41 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...