Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QLSCX
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QLSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$44.73
Change+$0.57 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.02B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$25.96
Change+$0.49 (+1.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.33B
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QLSCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and QLSCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. QLSCX (1.33B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: FTHFX (0.79) vs QLSCX (0.38). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QLSCX (9 years). QLSCX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QLSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.77 vs. FTHFX (-0.90). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 80.01 vs. QLSCX (42.19).
| FTHFX | QLSCX | FTHFX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.88 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.88 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.774 | -5.034 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 1.33B | 750% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.38 | 205% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.90 | 6.77 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.29 | 12.59 | 225% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.01 | 42.19 | 190% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement