Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QLSCX
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QLSCX
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QLSCX commentary
Aug 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and QLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. QLSCX (2.31B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: FTHFX (0.56) vs QLSCX (0.29). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: FTHFX (15 years) vs QLSCX (10 years). QLSCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QLSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.13 vs. QLSCX (26.06). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 66.14 vs. QLSCX (23.04).
| FTHFX | QLSCX | FTHFX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.88 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.89 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.115 | 20.275 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 2.31B | 524% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.29 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.13 | 26.06 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.08 | 61.07 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.14 | 23.04 | 287% |
| Returns for 10 years | 248.03 | 121.74 | 204% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers