Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QLSCX
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QLSCX
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QLSCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and QLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. QLSCX (2.21B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: FTHFX (0.59) vs QLSCX (0.28). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: FTHFX (15 years) vs QLSCX (10 years). QLSCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QLSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.94 vs. FTHFX (29.68). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.64 vs. QLSCX (22.91).
| FTHFX | QLSCX | FTHFX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.88 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.89 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.476 | 19.641 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 2.21B | 508% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.28 | 211% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.68 | 31.94 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.42 | 70.06 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.64 | 22.91 | 265% |
| Returns for 10 years | 250.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement