Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QSMLX
FTHFX vs QSMLX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QSMLX
FTHFX vs QSMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QSMLX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and QSMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. QSMLX (366M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QSMLX: FTHFX (0.57) vs QSMLX (0.24). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QSMLX: FTHFX (15 years) vs QSMLX (13 years). QSMLX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). QSMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FTHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QSMLX: FTHFX (1000000) vs QSMLX (5000000). QSMLX (26.02) and FTHFX (25.56) have marching annual gain over last year. FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.58 vs. QSMLX (29.40).
| FTHFX | QSMLX | FTHFX / QSMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.94 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.94 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.175 | 23.844 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 366M | 3,306% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.24 | 234% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.56 | 26.02 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.30 | 38.22 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.58 | 29.40 | 223% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.04 | 81.96 | 282% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement