Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QSMLX
FTHFX vs QSMLX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QSMLX
FTHFX vs QSMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QSMLX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and QSMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. QSMLX (377M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QSMLX: FTHFX (0.59) vs QSMLX (0.25). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QSMLX: FTHFX (15 years) vs QSMLX (13 years). QSMLX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). QSMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FTHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QSMLX: FTHFX (1000000) vs QSMLX (5000000). QSMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.14 vs. FTHFX (30.99). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 61.64 vs. QSMLX (27.04).
| FTHFX | QSMLX | FTHFX / QSMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.94 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.94 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.922 | 25.275 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 377M | 2,971% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.25 | 233% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.99 | 34.14 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.63 | 47.96 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.64 | 27.04 | 228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 248.41 | 97.98 | 254% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement