Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QSMLX
FTHFX vs QSMLX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QSMLX
FTHFX vs QSMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QSMLX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and QSMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. QSMLX (362M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QSMLX: FTHFX (0.56) vs QSMLX (0.25). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QSMLX: FTHFX (15 years) vs QSMLX (13 years). QSMLX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). QSMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FTHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QSMLX: FTHFX (1000000) vs QSMLX (5000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.30 vs. QSMLX (12.53). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.92 vs. QSMLX (24.30).
| FTHFX | QSMLX | FTHFX / QSMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.94 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.94 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.839 | 21.586 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 362M | 3,343% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.25 | 225% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | 12.53 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.68 | 38.60 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.92 | 24.30 | 251% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.29 | 78.91 | 301% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement