Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QSMNX
FTHFX vs QSMNX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QSMNX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.75
Change-$0.54 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.11B
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style N
Price$18.55
Change-$0.24 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets126.28M
FTHFX vs QSMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QSMNX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and QSMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. QSMNX (126M). QSMNX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: QSMNX (1.26) vs FTHFX (0.74). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QSMNX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QSMNX (12 years). QSMNX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QSMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). QSMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QSMNX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.63 vs. QSMNX (4.78). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 92.73 vs. QSMNX (50.60).
| FTHFX | QSMNX | FTHFX / QSMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.86 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.02 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.520 | 8.989 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 126M | 8,810% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 1.26 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.63 | 4.78 | 180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.76 | 14.65 | 278% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.73 | 50.60 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.63 | 47.39 | 335% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement