Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QSMNX
FTHFX vs QSMNX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QSMNX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.72
Change-$0.48 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.62B
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style N
Price$17.87
Change-$0.29 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets117.03M
FTHFX vs QSMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QSMNX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and QSMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. QSMNX (117M). QSMNX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: QSMNX (1.25) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QSMNX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QSMNX (12 years). QSMNX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QSMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). QSMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QSMNX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.03 vs. QSMNX (-1.05). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 103.31 vs. QSMNX (65.15).
| FTHFX | QSMNX | FTHFX / QSMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.86 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.02 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.862 | 4.994 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 117M | 9,060% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.25 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.03 | -1.05 | -290% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.68 | 26.73 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.31 | 65.15 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 145.26 | 38.78 | 375% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement