Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QSMNX
FTHFX vs QSMNX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QSMNX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.47
Change+$0.27 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.08B
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style N
Price$19.66
Change-$0.15 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.34M
FTHFX vs QSMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QSMNX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and QSMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. QSMNX (136M). QSMNX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: QSMNX (1.13) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QSMNX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QSMNX (13 years). QSMNX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QSMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). QSMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QSMNX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). QSMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.95 vs. FTHFX (-1.91). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 94.83 vs. QSMNX (53.17).
| FTHFX | QSMNX | FTHFX / QSMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.86 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.02 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.917 | 15.511 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 136M | 8,162% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.13 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.91 | 1.95 | -98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.30 | 37.33 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.83 | 53.17 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.48 | 61.15 | 277% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers