Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QSMNX
FTHFX vs QSMNX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QSMNX
FTHFX vs QSMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QSMNX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and QSMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. QSMNX (377M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QSMNX: FTHFX (0.59) vs QSMNX (0.10). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QSMNX: FTHFX (15 years) vs QSMNX (13 years). QSMNX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). QSMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). QSMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QSMNX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). QSMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.83 vs. FTHFX (29.68). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.64 vs. QSMNX (23.66).
| FTHFX | QSMNX | FTHFX / QSMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.20 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.25 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.476 | 25.138 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 377M | 2,971% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.10 | 567% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.68 | 31.83 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.42 | 46.88 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.64 | 23.66 | 256% |
| Returns for 10 years | 250.12 | 93.06 | 269% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement