Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs RCSIX
FTHFX vs RCSIX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RCSIX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.34
Change+$0.27 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.13B
FTHFX vs RCSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RCSIX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RCSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.14B vs. RCSIX (31.4M). RCSIX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: RCSIX (0.89) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RCSIX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RCSIX (34 years). RCSIX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RCSIX (37.00). RCSIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RCSIX (250000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.16 vs. RCSIX (-22.66). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.37 vs. RCSIX (-46.45).
| FTHFX | RCSIX | FTHFX / RCSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.86 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.779 | -14.004 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250000 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.14B | 31.4M | 29,092% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.89 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.16 | -22.66 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.87 | -35.69 | -56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.37 | -46.45 | -201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.84 | -65.35 | -118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers