Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RLACX
FTHFX vs RLACX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RLACX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$44.73
Change+$0.57 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.02B
Russell Inv US Small Cap Equity A
Price$23.56
Change+$0.34 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets630.82M
FTHFX vs RLACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RLACX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and RLACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. RLACX (631M). RLACX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: RLACX (1.45) vs FTHFX (0.79). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RLACX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RLACX (17 years). RLACX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). RLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). RLACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RLACX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.90 vs. RLACX (-10.08). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 80.01 vs. RLACX (-0.76).
| FTHFX | RLACX | FTHFX / RLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.37 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.37 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.774 | -5.305 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 631M | 1,585% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.45 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.90 | -10.08 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.29 | -8.82 | -321% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.01 | -0.76 | -10,523% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.94 | -21.78 | -629% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement