Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RLACX
FTHFX vs RLACX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RLACX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.71
Change+$0.55 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.5B
Russell Inv US Small Cap Equity A
Price$24.48
Change+$0.23 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets629.12M
FTHFX vs RLACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RLACX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RLACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. RLACX (629M). RLACX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: RLACX (1.39) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RLACX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RLACX (17 years). RLACX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). RLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). RLACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RLACX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.02 vs. RLACX (-13.33). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.33 vs. RLACX (6.70).
| FTHFX | RLACX | FTHFX / RLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.37 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.37 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.629 | -2.532 | -64% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 629M | 1,669% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.39 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.02 | -13.33 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.95 | 3.56 | 1,289% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.33 | 6.70 | 1,392% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.73 | -19.85 | -714% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement