Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RLACX
FTHFX vs RLACX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RLACX
FTHFX vs RLACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RLACX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RLACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. RLACX (951M). RLACX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: RLACX (0.74) vs FTHFX (0.56). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RLACX: FTHFX (15 years) vs RLACX (18 years). RLACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). RLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). RLACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RLACX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX (15.30) and RLACX (14.68) have marching annual gain over last year. FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.92 vs. RLACX (-17.69).
| FTHFX | RLACX | FTHFX / RLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.36 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.36 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.839 | 19.416 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 951M | 1,272% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.74 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | 14.68 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.68 | 25.09 | 234% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.92 | -17.69 | -344% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.29 | 10.47 | 2,266% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement