Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RLESX
FTHFX vs RLESX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RLESX
FTHFX vs RLESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RLESX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and RLESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. RLESX (1B). RLESX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: RLESX (0.97) vs FTHFX (0.59). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RLESX: FTHFX (15 years) vs RLESX (18 years). RLESX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). RLESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). RLESX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RLESX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX (30.99) and RLESX (30.30) have marching annual gain over last year. FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 61.64 vs. RLESX (-17.74).
| FTHFX | RLESX | FTHFX / RLESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.07 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.11 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.922 | 20.172 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 1B | 1,118% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.97 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.99 | 30.30 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.63 | 29.28 | 210% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.64 | -17.74 | -347% |
| Returns for 10 years | 248.41 | 22.35 | 1,112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement