Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RLESX
FTHFX vs RLESX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RLESX
FTHFX vs RLESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RLESX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and RLESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. RLESX (997M). RLESX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: RLESX (0.91) vs FTHFX (0.57). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RLESX: FTHFX (15 years) vs RLESX (18 years). RLESX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). RLESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). RLESX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RLESX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). RLESX (25.66) and FTHFX (25.56) have marching annual gain over last year. FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.58 vs. RLESX (-13.99).
| FTHFX | RLESX | FTHFX / RLESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.07 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.11 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.175 | 22.201 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 997M | 1,214% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.91 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.56 | 25.66 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.30 | 25.20 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.58 | -13.99 | -469% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.04 | 16.31 | 1,416% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers