Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RLESX
FTHFX vs RLESX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RLESX
FTHFX vs RLESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RLESX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RLESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. RLESX (951M). RLESX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: RLESX (0.93) vs FTHFX (0.56). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RLESX: FTHFX (15 years) vs RLESX (18 years). RLESX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). RLESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). RLESX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RLESX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX (15.30) and RLESX (15.19) have marching annual gain over last year. FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.92 vs. RLESX (-15.89).
| FTHFX | RLESX | FTHFX / RLESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.07 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.11 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.839 | 19.664 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 951M | 1,272% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.93 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | 15.19 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.68 | 26.73 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.92 | -15.89 | -383% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.29 | 13.86 | 1,712% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement