Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RMCFX
FTHFX vs RMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RMCFX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.48
Change+$0.29 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.71B
FTHFX vs RMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RMCFX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. RMCFX (284M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than RMCFX: FTHFX (0.74) vs RMCFX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RMCFX: FTHFX (14 years) vs RMCFX (23 years). RMCFX (1.54) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RMCFX (18.00). RMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RMCFX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.89 vs. RMCFX (-0.64). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 86.93 vs. RMCFX (5.25).
| FTHFX | RMCFX | FTHFX / RMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.49 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.54 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.535 | 0.464 | 977% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 284M | 3,768% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.89 | -0.64 | -761% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.50 | 2.08 | 1,999% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.93 | 5.25 | 1,655% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.47 | -16.94 | -894% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers