Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RMCFX
FTHFX vs RMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RMCFX
FTHFX vs RMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RMCFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RMCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. RMCFX (395M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than RMCFX: FTHFX (0.56) vs RMCFX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RMCFX: FTHFX (15 years) vs RMCFX (24 years). RMCFX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). RMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). RMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RMCFX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). RMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.08 vs. FTHFX (15.30). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.92 vs. RMCFX (-6.08).
| FTHFX | RMCFX | FTHFX / RMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.49 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.57 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.839 | 34.962 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 395M | 3,063% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | 21.08 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.68 | 39.55 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.92 | -6.08 | -1,002% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.29 | 26.39 | 899% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement