Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RMCFX
FTHFX vs RMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RMCFX
FTHFX vs RMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RMCFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. RMCFX (390M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than RMCFX: FTHFX (0.56) vs RMCFX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RMCFX: FTHFX (15 years) vs RMCFX (24 years). RMCFX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). RMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). RMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RMCFX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). RMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.03 vs. FTHFX (27.29). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.47 vs. RMCFX (-8.02).
| FTHFX | RMCFX | FTHFX / RMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.49 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.57 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.111 | 33.741 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 390M | 3,103% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.29 | 31.03 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.50 | 28.78 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.47 | -8.02 | -817% |
| Returns for 10 years | 244.71 | 26.80 | 913% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers