Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RMCFX
FTHFX vs RMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RMCFX
FTHFX vs RMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RMCFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and RMCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. RMCFX (406M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than RMCFX: FTHFX (0.57) vs RMCFX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RMCFX: FTHFX (15 years) vs RMCFX (24 years). RMCFX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). RMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). RMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RMCFX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). RMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.31 vs. FTHFX (25.56). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.58 vs. RMCFX (-2.39).
| FTHFX | RMCFX | FTHFX / RMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.49 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.57 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.175 | 37.970 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 406M | 2,980% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.56 | 34.31 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.30 | 37.45 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.58 | -2.39 | -2,740% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.04 | 30.93 | 747% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement