Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RPMAX
FTHFX vs RPMAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RPMAX
FTHFX vs RPMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RPMAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RPMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. RPMAX (717M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than RPMAX: FTHFX (0.56) vs RPMAX (0.06). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RPMAX: FTHFX (15 years) vs RPMAX (8 years). RPMAX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). RPMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). RPMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RPMAX (5000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.30 vs. RPMAX (14.22). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.92 vs. RPMAX (43.41).
| FTHFX | RPMAX | FTHFX / RPMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.20 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.48 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.839 | 22.429 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 717M | 1,688% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.06 | 952% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | 14.22 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.68 | 46.23 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.92 | 43.41 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers