Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RPRCX
FTHFX vs RPRCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RPRCX
FTHFX vs RPRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RPRCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and RPRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. RPRCX (1.11B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than RPRCX: FTHFX (0.57) vs RPRCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RPRCX: FTHFX (15 years) vs RPRCX (23 years). RPRCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. RPRCX (20.00). RPRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RPRCX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.56 vs. RPRCX (8.02). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.58 vs. RPRCX (-21.29).
| FTHFX | RPRCX | FTHFX / RPRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 2.24 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 2.46 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.175 | 18.373 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 1.11B | 1,089% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.56 | 8.02 | 319% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.30 | 1.92 | 2,879% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.58 | -21.29 | -308% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.04 | -30.50 | -758% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement