Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RSCRX
FTHFX vs RSCRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RSCRX
FTHFX vs RSCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RSCRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and RSCRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. RSCRX (1B). RSCRX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: RSCRX (1.05) vs FTHFX (0.59). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RSCRX: FTHFX (15 years) vs RSCRX (10 years). RSCRX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). RSCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). RSCRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RSCRX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX (29.68) and RSCRX (29.26) have marching annual gain over last year. FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.64 vs. RSCRX (-18.32).
| FTHFX | RSCRX | FTHFX / RSCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.94 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.96 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.476 | 20.453 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 1B | 1,118% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 1.05 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.68 | 29.26 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.42 | 30.06 | 208% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.64 | -18.32 | -331% |
| Returns for 10 years | 250.12 | 24.32 | 1,028% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement