Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RSCRX
FTHFX vs RSCRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RSCRX
FTHFX vs RSCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RSCRX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and RSCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. RSCRX (997M). RSCRX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: RSCRX (0.99) vs FTHFX (0.57). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RSCRX: FTHFX (15 years) vs RSCRX (10 years). RSCRX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). RSCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). RSCRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RSCRX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). RSCRX (25.83) and FTHFX (25.56) have marching annual gain over last year. FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.58 vs. RSCRX (-13.62).
| FTHFX | RSCRX | FTHFX / RSCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.94 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.96 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.175 | 22.248 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 997M | 1,214% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.99 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.56 | 25.83 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.30 | 25.66 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.58 | -13.62 | -481% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.04 | 17.97 | 1,286% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement