Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs RYMCX
FTHFX vs RYMCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs RYMCX
FTHFX vs RYMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. RYMCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and RYMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. RYMCX (390M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than RYMCX: FTHFX (0.56) vs RYMCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than RYMCX: FTHFX (15 years) vs RYMCX (28 years). RYMCX (2.49) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). RYMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). RYMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: RYMCX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). RYMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.04 vs. FTHFX (27.29). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.47 vs. RYMCX (-11.60).
| FTHFX | RYMCX | FTHFX / RYMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 2.24 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 2.49 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.111 | 33.165 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 390M | 3,103% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.29 | 30.04 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.50 | 25.84 | 211% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.47 | -11.60 | -565% |
| Returns for 10 years | 244.71 | 13.24 | 1,848% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement