Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SCRSX
FTHFX vs SCRSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SCRSX
FTHFX vs SCRSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SCRSX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and SCRSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. SCRSX (863M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SCRSX: FTHFX (0.56) vs SCRSX (0.29). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SCRSX: FTHFX (15 years) vs SCRSX (11 years). SCRSX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). SCRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). SCRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SCRSX (5000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.72 vs. SCRSX (19.62). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. SCRSX (-2.66).
| FTHFX | SCRSX | FTHFX / SCRSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.13 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.13 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.613 | 23.216 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 863M | 1,402% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.29 | 193% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.72 | 19.62 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.64 | 16.81 | 384% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.28 | -2.66 | -2,525% |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.65 | 39.38 | 614% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement