Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SLPAX
FTHFX vs SLPAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SLPAX
FTHFX vs SLPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SLPAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and SLPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. SLPAX (198M). SLPAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: SLPAX (1.11) vs FTHFX (0.56). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SLPAX: FTHFX (15 years) vs SLPAX (30 years). SLPAX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). SLPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). SLPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SLPAX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.72 vs. SLPAX (-0.92). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. SLPAX (-17.82).
| FTHFX | SLPAX | FTHFX / SLPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.42 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.72 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.613 | 16.817 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 198M | 6,111% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.11 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.72 | -0.92 | -2,686% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.64 | 28.22 | 229% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.28 | -17.82 | -378% |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.65 | -8.48 | -2,849% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement