Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SSCPX
FTHFX vs SSCPX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SSCPX
FTHFX vs SSCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SSCPX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and SSCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. SSCPX (7.44M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SSCPX: FTHFX (0.57) vs SSCPX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SSCPX: FTHFX (15 years) vs SSCPX (32 years). SSCPX (2.50) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). SSCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 145.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). SSCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SSCPX (250) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.56 vs. SSCPX (21.66). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.58 vs. SSCPX (-6.19).
| FTHFX | SSCPX | FTHFX / SSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 2.50 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 2.50 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.175 | 23.796 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 7.44M | 162,547% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.56 | 21.66 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.30 | 29.27 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.58 | -6.19 | -1,059% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.04 | 48.54 | 476% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement