Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SSLCX
FTHFX vs SSLCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SSLCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.47
Change+$0.27 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.02B
FTHFX vs SSLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SSLCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and SSLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. SSLCX (1.04B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SSLCX: FTHFX (0.69) vs SSLCX (0.63). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SSLCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs SSLCX (25 years). SSLCX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. SSLCX (29.00). SSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SSLCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). SSLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.60 vs. FTHFX (-2.45). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.77 vs. SSLCX (87.50).
| FTHFX | SSLCX | FTHFX / SSLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.92 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.92 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.322 | 6.361 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 1.04B | 1,063% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.63 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.45 | 5.60 | -44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.48 | 29.02 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.77 | 87.50 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 168.01 | 104.52 | 161% |