Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SSLCX
FTHFX vs SSLCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SSLCX
FTHFX vs SSLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SSLCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and SSLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. SSLCX (1.11B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SSLCX: FTHFX (0.59) vs SSLCX (0.14). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SSLCX: FTHFX (15 years) vs SSLCX (26 years). SSLCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. SSLCX (16.00). SSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SSLCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.68 vs. SSLCX (15.11). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.64 vs. SSLCX (28.65).
| FTHFX | SSLCX | FTHFX / SSLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.89 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.89 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.476 | 13.066 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 1.11B | 1,008% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.14 | 413% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.68 | 15.11 | 196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.42 | 44.03 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.64 | 28.65 | 212% |
| Returns for 10 years | 250.12 | 152.47 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement