Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs SWSCX
FTHFX vs SWSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs SWSCX
FTHFX vs SWSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. SWSCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and SWSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. SWSCX (661M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than SWSCX: FTHFX (0.59) vs SWSCX (0.12). FTHFX was incepted earlier than SWSCX: FTHFX (15 years) vs SWSCX (23 years). SWSCX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). SWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). SWSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: SWSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). SWSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.73 vs. FTHFX (30.99). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 61.64 vs. SWSCX (10.80).
| FTHFX | SWSCX | FTHFX / SWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.09 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.09 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.922 | 22.504 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 661M | 1,694% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.12 | 489% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.99 | 36.73 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.63 | 43.58 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.64 | 10.80 | 571% |
| Returns for 10 years | 248.41 | 45.11 | 551% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement