Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WHGCX
FTHFX vs WHGCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WHGCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund C
Price$18.86
Change-$0.04 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets905.05M
FTHFX vs WHGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WHGCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WHGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. WHGCX (905M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WHGCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs WHGCX (0.27). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WHGCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WHGCX (6 years). WHGCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WHGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). WHGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WHGCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.11 vs. WHGCX (-14.17). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.21 vs. WHGCX (18.81).
| FTHFX | WHGCX | FTHFX / WHGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.79 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.93 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.957 | -5.073 | -137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 905M | 1,193% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.27 | 265% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.11 | -14.17 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.76 | -0.71 | -5,168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.21 | 18.81 | 421% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers