Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WHGCX
FTHFX vs WHGCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WHGCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.48
Change+$0.29 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.71B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund C
Price$19.67
Change+$0.05 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets981.6M
FTHFX vs WHGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WHGCX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WHGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. WHGCX (982M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WHGCX: FTHFX (0.74) vs WHGCX (0.26). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WHGCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WHGCX (6 years). WHGCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WHGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). WHGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WHGCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. WHGCX (-3.55). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 85.78 vs. WHGCX (34.08).
| FTHFX | WHGCX | FTHFX / WHGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.79 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.93 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.897 | -1.205 | -323% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 982M | 1,090% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.26 | 287% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | -3.55 | -120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.63 | 5.91 | 687% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.78 | 34.08 | 252% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers