Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WHGCX
FTHFX vs WHGCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WHGCX
FTHFX vs WHGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WHGCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WHGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. WHGCX (882M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WHGCX: FTHFX (0.59) vs WHGCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WHGCX: FTHFX (15 years) vs WHGCX (7 years). WHGCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). WHGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). WHGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WHGCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.99 vs. WHGCX (12.15). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 61.64 vs. WHGCX (0.43).
| FTHFX | WHGCX | FTHFX / WHGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.79 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.93 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.922 | 13.821 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 882M | 1,270% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.99 | 12.15 | 255% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.63 | 17.07 | 361% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.64 | 0.43 | 14,426% |
| Returns for 10 years | 248.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement